Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Some thoughts on the Trinity

The following is an attempt to summarize a discussion on the Trinity addressed in Kyle Strobel's book, "Jonathan Edwards's Theology: A Reinterpretation"

Edwards is considered by many to be the greatest theological mind produced in America. The above book is an overview and summary of Jonathan Edwards understanding of God as revealed in scripture. 

If you wish to read an excerpt from Strobel's book summarizing Edwards overview click here. It may help explain the comments that follow below. 

Because Strobel's book is not the easiest read I have summarized his thoughts below regarding the Trinity for greater clarity. Hopefully, you will find it helpful as well. 

Describing and attempting to grasp the infinite God with finite reasoning and words is limited at best but a task worth undertaking. 

There can be no greater pursuit than pursuing the beautifully mysterious, incomprehensible, infinitely glorious, majestic, all powerful, all wise God of love. To see and know him truly is to pursue him more fully. If you find the below helpful, you may wish to read Strobel's entire book.

You will note I use several words interchangeably and not always in the same order. This is deliberate in an attempt to better capture the fullness of meaning and nuances conveyed by the various words and different orders. I recommend you also read the footnotes after the article where I further clarify some of the main points. 
________________________________

·      The Son/Word (Logos Jn 1:1) is God's perfect [1]understanding of himself. 

An understanding so perfect and complete it issues forth (is begotten) into a separate person as God the Son of his Father (the begetter of the only eternally begotten Son Joh 1:14;1:18;3:16;3:18 ).

·      The Spirit is God's perfect love of himself. 

A love drawn out of the Father in perfect affections (as the Spirit) for the object of that love, which is the Logos, the perfect (complete) understanding of himself.

This drawing out of love involves God choosing what he has the greatest affections for and is most attracted to. He is attracted to what is most lovely/beautiful as he beholds the perfect understanding of himself i.e. The Logos/Word of God


How we are like God and not like God

We in turn, as his created image bearers, do the same i.e. we are attracted to and have affections for what we behold as most lovely/beautiful. In this way, loving and choosing (willing) are connected for both God as Creator, as well as us who are his created (vs eternal) image bearers. To love something is to have affections for it and be attracted or drawn to it. To be attracted to it versus attracted to something else is to choose (will/want) it over something else. 

[2]We only are able to see God as most lovely by the Spirit revealing his loveliness to us. The very same Spirit of love between the Father and the Son. This is due to our spiritual deadness caused by our turning away from God and cutting ourselves off from the very life of God. To see spiritual things we must have spiritual life which gives us spiritual eyes. 

In a similar way as the Son and Spirit, we are unique individuals with our own [3]understanding and will but as created image bearers (in contrast to the Logos who is the eternally begotten image bearer). Just as the Son and Spirit [4]issue forth from God so we too issue forth from God but as created persons; not as the eternal persons of Son and Spirit.
________________________________

[1] In a sense you can say Christ is God's "self-image." Of course unlike ours, which is warped and distorted by our brokenness, Gods " self-image" is perfect and complete. So much so that his issues forth into the person of his Son; the exact representation of his nature or being (Heb 1:3; Col 1:15) while also distinct from him in person. "... The Word (logos) was (equal to) God and the Word was with (distinct from) God..." Jn 1:1 i.e. The same while also distinct at the same time. The same in essence/nature/being, while distinct in person.

[2]The Holy Spirit is the holy breath or holy passion (emotion) of God. A passion between the Father and Son that issues forth in the distinct person of the Holy Spirit. 

Hebrew definition for spirit. 


spirit - H7307   רוּח  rûach

BDB (Brown-Drive-Briggs) Definition:
1) wind, breath, mind, spirit
1a) breath
1b) wind
1b1) of heaven
1b2) quarter (of wind), side
1b3) breath of air
1b4) air, gas
1b5) vain, empty thing
1c) spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
1c1) spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
1c2) courage
1c3) temper, anger
1c4) impatience, patience
1c5) spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
1c6) disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
1c7) prophetic spirit
1d) spirit (of the living, breathing being in man and animals)
1d1) as gift, preserved by God, God’s spirit, departing at death, disembodied being
1e) spirit (as seat of emotion)
1e1) desire
1e2) sorrow, trouble
1f) spirit
1f1) as seat or organ of mental acts
1f2) rarely of the will
1f3) as seat especially of moral character
1g) Spirit of God, the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
1g1) as inspiring ecstatic state of prophecy
1g2) as impelling prophet to utter instruction or warning
1g3) imparting warlike energy and executive and administrative power
1g4) as endowing men with various gifts
1g5) as energy of life
1g6) as manifest in the Shekinah glory
1g7) never referred to as a depersonalized force

Part of Speech: noun feminine
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: from H7306

The following is a list of some of the things implied by this definition. 
1. Spirit (or spirit) in the OT has the same general definition in every instance (see definition below). This general definition has no qualifiers such as "Holy Spirit" or "Spirit of God." When these qualifiers are applied, this determines a specific meaning outside its common use i.e. how do we know when this same word is referring to God versus man? When there are qualifiers such as "Holy", "of God" or "man's spirit..." 
2. Also note in the above definition, emotions themselves are common characteristics or attributes in defining "spirit." Unlike us, however, God doesn't have general emotions, such as anger, but only righteous or holy emotions. But they are still no less emotions. For example, the emotion of anger for God is a holy or righteous anger, not an unrighteous one.  
3. Lastly, it's worth noting that spirit in the OT is always in the feminine gender (and neutral in the NT). This may be significant since the Holy Spirit is the spirit of love (relationship) between the Father and Son.

It is also worth noting that generally (there are always exceptions), the emotional aspect of relationships is more a strength of the feminine gender than the masculine. This add's significance to the fact that "God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them" (Gen 1:27). Both feminine and masculine are rooted on God's nature. This may help explain the differences between the genders as men tend to be more cerebral and action/production driven or oriented and women more supportive, nurturing, emotionally and relationally oriented and driven; making neither gender superior (no more than Christ or the Spirit are inferior to the Father, though certainly different in role ...The Father sends, the Son is sent). Both are necessary to convey the full spectrum of God's nature and reflect unique aspects of each gender in God's makeup

The difference in gender is not a matter of value before God. Clearly, genders are equal in value and different only in role. This also corresponds with Edwards proposal of what constitutes a person i.e. understanding (reason) and will (emotion). Both genders have these attributes in various degrees and neither attribute is more important or significant than the other. Both are vital to personhood and male and female both being in God's image. 
[3] Edwards proposes that the two qualities of understanding and will are the essential characteristics of what comprises a person versus say, a body ("will" includes our affections. For more discussion click here). We, creatures, see ourselves as distinct because we have a body but God (prior to his incarnation) did not have a body, so his distinction lies (rests) elsewhere i.e. In having his own separate and distinct self-understanding (the Logos) and will (the Spirit).

We could say understanding and will correspond with knowing and feeling. What distinguishes one person from another is that each person has their own unique understanding (knowing) and will (choosing/feeling/affections). This too may be what distinguishes us as image bearers from other creatures not in God's image. 

As physical beings, we each have our own location but we can also know and choose God in a way other creatures can not and that knowing and choosing is our own, not those of *anyone else. 

*Maybe not even God himself in some mysterious fashion -- yet at the same time, all things are to, through and from him, just as the Logos and Spirit are distinct yet of the same essence as God. Only speculating of course. We may never know with certainty how these things work, at least not in this life. Then again for God to be God (infinite and unfathomable) we may never fully know since there is no "end" to him. He is truly distinct i.e. He is God. We are not.   

[4] Note: This would explain why the Bible speaks of God sending forth his Son and the Father and Son together sending forth the Spirit. John 17:3; 14:26; 15:26; 16:7. The Father first begets the Son -- not chronologically since God is eternal but in order of succession i.e. the Father initiates and begets the Son. The Son is begotten. By and through the eternal union/relationship/love of the Father and the Son/Logos/Word, they, in turn, beget/issue forth and send the Spirit.

      The Father gazes upon the Son and the Son gazes upon the Father in perfect delight. This beatific delight is so tangible and complete it issues forth (overflows) into the distinct person of the Holy Spirit; the very (and holy) affection/passion of God for himself as mirrored (imaged) back to himself in/by the Word/Logos of God, the perfect/complete understanding of himself.

Note: In order for the Spirit to be distinct and completely other, the Logos also had to be a distinct and completely other person; each person of the Trinity having their own unique and individual understanding and will.

Edwards himself -- as well as Strobel -- did not directly say the Son and Spirit had their own will and understanding. He simply says understanding and will are the qualities of distinct persons. I am suggesting they do based on Christ's prayer in the garden of Gethsemane "not my will but yours be done..." While at the same time the Son and Spirit's understanding and will were in absolute and perfect harmony with the Father's. 




Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Fully loved...completely broken

We are fully loved and completely broken at the same time. How do we function when these both exist together within us? 

This can only happen if we are in Christ and recognize: 

·        God fully knows us as we are (there are no secrets or surprises for him, even when there are for us). 
·        He completely receives and embraces us with full knowledge of all our brokenness.
·        Our brokenness always produces broken actions and consequences. 
·        God does not spare us from the consequences of our broken choices but uses them to advance us (He's bigger than our brokenness).
·        God redeems and uses everything for his glory; both our actions and their consequences.
·        God always sees and focuses on the potential he originally created us for, never on our failures.
·        God is always forward-looking, never backward-looking.
·        He is always sad for us (vs. disappointed or mad at us) when we fail and always rejoices when we succeed.
·        He always hurts when we are hurting. He fully feels our pain because of his own pain which he willingly and gladly experienced for us.

God always loves us, is always with us, always applauds our successes, always offers comfort in our struggles and failures (we must believe this, to experience it), and always uses these to advance us.

How can all this be true?

God's love, wisdom, power, and presence are not based on what we do or don't do, but on who he is and what he has done for us in and through Christ. 

"The gospel says you are more sinful and flawed than you ever dared to believe, but more accepted and loved than you ever dared to hope." - Tim Keller

To the director: A praise song of David, Kind of Israel
LORD, you have examined me and you know me. You know everything I do; from far away you understand all my thoughts. You see me, whether I am working or resting; you know all my actions. Even before I speak, you already know what I will say.  You are all around me on every side; you protect me with your power.

Your knowledge of me is too deep; it is beyond my understanding. Where could I go to escape from you? Where could I get away from your presence? If I went up to heaven, you would be there; if I lay down in the world of the dead, you would be there. If I flew away beyond the east or lived in the farthest place in the west,  you would be there to lead me, you would be there to help me.  I could ask the darkness to hide me or the light around me to turn into night, but even darkness is not dark for you, and the night is as bright as the day. Darkness and light are the same to you.

You created every part of me; you put me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because you are to be feared; all you do is strange and wonderful. I know it with all my heart. When my bones were being formed, carefully put together in my mother's womb, when I was growing there in secret, you knew that I was there---you saw me before I was born.

The days allotted to me had all been recorded in your book, before any of them ever began.

O God, how difficult I find your thoughts; how many of them there are! If I counted them, they would be more than the grains of sand. When I awake, I am still with you.

O God, how I wish you would kill the wicked! How I wish violent people would leave me alone!
They say wicked things about you; they speak evil things against your name.
O LORD, how I hate those who hate you! How I despise those who rebel against you!
I hate them with a total hatred; I regard them as my enemies.

Examine me, O God, and know my mind; test me, and discover my thoughts.

Find out if there is any evil in me and guide me in the everlasting way.
 - Psa 139:1-24 (GNT)




Sunday, May 1, 2016

More important, doing or being?

So which is more important, 

·        doing (faithful obedience, action) 
or   
·        being (recognizing/resting/abiding in the reality that we are infinitely valued and fully loved in Christ regardless of what we do or don't do i.e. no strings attached)

There is a tension in the Christian life between being (abiding) and doing (obedience) which is often confusing. As with any tension, we tend to fall on one side or the other when both are equally true and necessary and actually connected. And we must be ever diligent in making sure we keep these in proper order and balance. 

On the being side

1. We are created in God's image
  
2. We are also a beloved child of God (if we are in Christ).

This is the status of our being or existence before and in Christ. It is something that was done for us, not by us. This is who we are and not something we did or do.


How do we reconcile these seemingly opposite realities of being vs doing?⁷

Fleshing out these two key aspects more fully:

  • BEING

1. Before Christ:

We are valued by God first by virtue of being his image-bearer (we possess the capacity to reflect and display his infinite worth unlike any other creature, even the angels). This is something about us he loves even before he adopts us as his child and places us in Christ.

Since God loves that which is most lovely, namely himself, he loves those creatures who also have the greatest capacity to best reflect him and his love out to others and back to Him. This has nothing to do with what we do and is true before we are adopted as his child in Christ. This has everything to do with our being who he made us to be - i.e. like himself, in his image (marred for sure but still bearers of his image, nevertheless, with the capacity - when empowered by His love/Spirit - to reflect him in a way the rest of his creation can not, not even angels).

2. In (or after) Christ:

If
 we are in Christ, adopted as his child, we are also someone loved by God (without us doing anything to cause that love. God is His own cause. He is love) to such an extent he took on our pain and suffering into his very being/person as the incarnate Christ, so we might reenter into and participate in his glory and joy as his image-bearer (similar to how we participated in his life and glory before the fall/rebellion).

We have not only the capacity to display his infinite worth to others by virtue of being like God (in his image) but in fact can again and do now display his glory as his adopted child, by and through His Spirit. God is now in us and for us, not against us.

This is who we are as bearers of His image and in Christ as His adopted and beloved child. These two have to do only with our being (who we are), not our doing. 

  • DOING

Once we are in Christ, we are created (have the capacity) to love as Christ loves i.e. sacrificially. Our "doing" does not add to our "being"  (i.e. make us more his image-bearer -- though it certainly makes us more like him in our conduct -- or more his beloved child any more than we already are in Christ) but springs forth from it - from who we are - and is the expression of it. We are empowered and able to love sacrificially because once we are in Christ we are loved sacrificially. It is this sacrificial love given to us in Christ that empowers us to love as Christ loved. 

However, we can not do as we were created to do i.e. we are not and cannot be empowered by his love, life, and Spirit, until we know - in the fullest sense, not just cognitively - who we are (being) first. We can not "do" in our own strength but only in the strength, we receive in knowing we are ("being") infinitely loved by God no matter what and designed to reflect him like nothing else can. This is the nature of our design by God - how we are supposed to operate - from the beginning and is still true. We are responders to His love, not initiators or the cause of it. 


Experiencing our BEING in DOING

Now here is where there is significant confusion. Doing and being have a direct connection and merger. 

It is hard to keep the distinction while at the same time making the connection. 

It is also hard to make the connection without losing the distinction.

We can not fully experience who we are (being) unless and until we live out (do) who we are (being).  

You may wish to pause and read this last sentence over a couple of times to let it sink in. 

Participating in who are (and were created to be) - as image bears with the high dignity of being able to put God on display in a way no other creature can and as an adopted child of Almighty God, loved no matter what we do or experience - is vital to fully enter in to and experience who we are created to be.

Doing is the means by which we fully participate in and engage who we are created to be and who we now are in Christ. Who we are in Christ is a matter of being first but also more fully entered into by doing i.e. by loving as we are loved. 

In other words, we can not fully experience subjectively all we are without acting out and upon who we are objectively. Granted this is an act of faith i.e. believing and fully recognizing we are (being) who God says - infinitely and perfectly loved image-bearers of God perfectly restored to the Father by Christ - and acting (doing) accordingly.

Why is this an act of faith? Because we rarely feel or see ourselves the way God sees us. You might even say never. Our understanding of God's love for us never actually matches the love he has for us. This will not occur until we see Him face to face. Then we will be like Him. But by His love/Spirit, we can now get glimpses of His infinite, relentless love. 

We are still broken. Our ongoing struggle with unbelief is evidence. But we are also in God's image and as His redeemed child, now indwelt by His Spirit - when fully participated in by faith - 
which is a far more significant part of who we are in the eyes of God than our broken and fallen condition - eyes which are far more significant than our broken condition. It is, in fact, God's final word (not ours), which is the final word and the only word that truly matters - as opposed to our own words or what others think or say about us. If God is for us, who can be against us? No one!!! Not even ourselves.  

This is not something we will necessarily feel before we act but once we act in this way - by faith, regardless of feelings - we more fully enter into and participate in who we are - an infinitely loved image bearer and child of God - in a way, we won't without acting/doing. 


Our brokenness is no longer an issue as far as God's love and desire to work in and through us. In Christ, this is a given. He is committed to us in love and will never back away no matter how poorly we live out who we are. Why? Because it's based on *Christ's efforts, not ours. 

But this is still an act based on who we are (being). It is not doing without first being. Not a doing to become someone, but a doing because we already are someone who is fully and infinitely loved in Christ.  

In other words, we may not necessarily feel we are loved or valued by God, but we act simply because God says we are and we believe his assessment because of who He is - the fully trustworthy, wise, powerful, and loving God. If He says it, it is true. Again, the connection is we act by or out of faith in who God is and says we are and not how we feel or what others say we are. 

He cherishes us whether we feel it or not, whether we view and cherish ourselves in the same way. We are simply called to believe God and His assessment of us. Christ's work on our behalf is our proof of His infinite, perfect love. Sending us His Spirit to live within us is our confirmation. It is also the power/means by which we live out this love to Him and others. 

We act based on his evaluation, claim, and promise, not on our experiencing any sense of that love. 

Even if and when we do have a sense of his presence, this itself is the result of faith i.e. the more we believe we are loved the more loved we may actually feel - though this isn't necessary for us to act. It simply helps make the action possible. Nevertheless, our action is based on faith in who we are - who God has declared us to be, not necessarily our experience/feeling of who we are.

This is, in fact, the very order and truth brought forth in the greatest commandment.

Mar 12:28  And one of the scribes came up and heard them disputing with one another, and seeing that he answered them well, asked him, "Which commandment is the most important of all?" 29  Jesus answered, "The most important is, 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.  30  And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.' 31  The second is this: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these."

Though it isn't directly stated here,  it is implied that the love for God is rooted in and springs forth from knowing God as he truly is. The expression "Hear, O Israel" is the equivalent of saying, listen up, pay attention, and recognize who this great God is. He is the one and only God and he alone. There is no one else. In the original quote in Deut 6:4, the word for LORD is Yahweh. He is the "I AM"; the self-existent one. This implies he needs no one. The commandment to love him that follows is a response to knowing this about him i.e. that he is the all-sufficient God.  He is the God who loves simply because he is love and is lovely, not because our love is needed by him or earned from him. If and when we truly know God as the all-sufficient, all-loving God he is, we will love him with everything we are and have. This is a response to His love set upon us by no deeds of our own but solely on the deeds of God himself. 

In short, to fully experience all that we are, we must act by faith upon the reality of who we are as declared by Him. And who he says we are is rooted in the belief/confidence/trust that He is who He says He is. This is the essence of what Paul declared in his doxology at the end of Romans 11. 

Rom
11:33  Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! 34  "For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?" 35  "Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?" 

Rom 11:36  For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen. 

Which is first, doing or being?

Another reason experiencing who we are comes in and by doing is it involves an order of priority. In order to do we must first be but if we only receive without giving out we become spiritually fat and lethargic and never become all God intends i.e. like God who is always flowing his love out to others. God's intent is not that we simply and only be loved but that we are loved for the purpose of loving/doing - loving others as we are loved. This is why the second part of the greatest commandment is tied to and follows or flows out of the first. He created us to not just receive his love but to share it, and give it outAs - in the same way - the Father has sent his Son, so he sends us i.e. to love others sacrificially.

·        Verses that indicate doing flows from being.

Joh 14:12  "Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me (being) will also do the works (doing) that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father.

In a sense believing is a kind of doing (work), but not an outward act as we normally considering doing but an inward disposition that requires great effort i.e. it's hard to believe we are loved when we don't feel loved or when we experience hardship and pain. 

"Abide (be) in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit (do) by itself, unless it abides (is/being) in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide (be) in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides (is/being) in me and I in him, he it is that bears (does) much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing." - Joh 15:4-5

·        Verses that indicate experiencing who we are (being) is the fruit of doing.

(GNB) Joh 13:17  Now that you know this truth, how happy you will be (who we are - i.e. our being) if you put it into practice (doing)!

(ESV) Joh 
13:17  If you know these things, blessed are you (who we are - being)  if you do them (doing).

"Whoever has -- a state of being -- my commandments and keeps (doing) them, he it is (being) who loves me -- demonstrates love by doing loving acts. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father -- subjectively enters into the experience of God's objective love secured by Christ, and I will love him and manifest myself to him --subjectively experience God's presence/caring."  

Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, "Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world?"

Jesus answered him, 
"If anyone loves me (is in my love), he will keep (do) my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. " - Joh 14:21-23 

On the surface, this sounds like God's love (objectively) for us is dependent on our obedience. But this can not be, based on other passages. These passages are talking about our experiencing his love (subjectively), not the objective and fixed reality of being the objects of his love and fully loved by him.

We see this with Christ himself. Christ says, " If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. " Joh 15:10 

Was the Father's love for Christ a reality prior to Christ's incarnation and Christ's subsequent obedience? Did Christ earn his Father's love by his obedience?

Not in the strict sense. The love between the Father and Son existed from all eternity past. The Father has always loved his Son and never stopped loving him at any time during the incarnation; even while he poured out his full wrath for our disobedience on him. Christ's obedience to the Father gave evidence/proof of his love for the Father, not cause the Father to love him more than He already did from all eternity past. 

But there was a sense in which the Father's love was experienced by even Christ through His obedience to the Father (obedience being the fruit of faith/abiding). God's love for his Son is a fixed objective reality. But this is not the same as Christ's subjective experience and participation in that love. Read the verse again. 

Christ says, " If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide (trust, rest and fully participate) in his love. " Joh 15:10 

Christ entered into and fully participated in (experienced) his Fathers love as a man through his obedience. Obedience is the fruit of faith.

What Christ's obedience did was prove his love for his Father i.e. it was the evidence of his love. And by Christ's acting out of love for his Father, he fully entered into and experienced that love in a way he could not have without obedience. 

"Whoever does not love me does not keep (do) my words. And the word that you hear is not mine but the Father's who sent me." - Joh 14:24 

"...but I do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may know (as evidenced by my obedience) that I love the Father..." - Joh 14:31 

"As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide (be) in my love.  If you keep (do) my commandments, you will abide (be) in my love, just as I have kept (do) my Father's commandments and abide (be) in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full." - Joh 15:9-11   

"You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear (do) fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you.   These things I command you, so that you will love one another." - Joh 15:16 

Joh 16:27  for the Father himself loves you, because you have loved me (do) and have believed (be) that I came from God.

1Jn_2:5  but whoever keeps (do) his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: 

perfected: τελειόω, teleioō

Thayer Definition:

1) to make perfect, complete
1a) to carry through completely, to accomplish, finish, bring to an end
2) to complete (perfect)
2a) add what is yet wanting in order to render a thing full
2b) to be found perfect
3) to bring to the end (goal) proposed
4) to accomplish
4a) bring to a close or fulfillment by event
4a1) of the prophecies of the scriptures
 ____________________________________________________________________

*What is an often overlooked but vital benefit of being in Christ is not only are all our sins - our dishonoring of God - past present or future, no longer held against us but neither do we need to do righteous deeds to be fully accepted/received by God. All the good deeds that Christ did right up to and including his very sacrificial death are counted as our righteous deeds i.e. as if we did them ourselves. We can not do any deeds that add to what Christ already did or how God already esteems us in Christ. We are given credit for all his righteous actions while on earth as if we did those very deedsall of them, even his very death for others. Before the ultimate and final judge - the only opinion that matters - we are the perfectly faithful (righteous) sons and daughters of God. And that Judge will be Christ himself. Who better to be the perfect Judge than the one who died for those to be judged?

So not only were all the consequences of our unfaithfulness in properly honoring God born by Christ but all the faithfulness of Christ in honoring the Father are fully credited to us. We are not only free of the consequences of our unfaithfulness to God but looked upon as perfectly faithful to him in carrying out all the things we are called to do. 

If and when we don't feel these things to be true, guess who moved? A clue… it wasn't God.